This seems like a well written article, but something seems a bit off. The writing just seems like it's pushing the perspective that students who don't perform well are ultimately at fault. Maybe it could have used an interview with someone who wasn't performing well? I don't really see anything 'from the other side of things' here, so to speak. This article seems like it's trying to make a hard distinction between 'good students who don't like troublemakers' and 'troublemakers', but what about people who don't fall on either side? Like someone who might not get good grades because a teacher might not be addressing noise concerns, and then hate on the teacher unnecessarily, or any situation more nuanced…
ถูกใจ
Sahara Iyer
20 ธ.ค. 2567
ตอบกลับไปที่
Saranshi we appreciate your comment! Can we include your reply in our next issue?
This seems like a well written article, but something seems a bit off. The writing just seems like it's pushing the perspective that students who don't perform well are ultimately at fault. Maybe it could have used an interview with someone who wasn't performing well? I don't really see anything 'from the other side of things' here, so to speak. This article seems like it's trying to make a hard distinction between 'good students who don't like troublemakers' and 'troublemakers', but what about people who don't fall on either side? Like someone who might not get good grades because a teacher might not be addressing noise concerns, and then hate on the teacher unnecessarily, or any situation more nuanced…